Blog

Bacon's Essays: Of Custom and Education

Francis Bacon’s first and probably best tutor was his own mother, Lady Anne Bacon. He doesn’t credit her in his essay about education, which is more general, in accordance with the style of such works. I’m relying on our good friend Richard Whately for help with this one, which is fairly opaque in my view.

Thoughts, words, and deeds

“Men’s thoughts, are much according to their inclination; their discourse and speeches, according to their learning and infused opinions; but their deeds, are after as they have been accustomed.”

François Ravaillac

With Whateley’s help, we understand this to mean that people think whatever they like and their speech is largely influenced by their education. (“Infused opinions” means “the kind of stuff you learn by reading the articles your friends post links to on Facebook,” updated.) But what people do – their deeds – derives largely from habit – custom.

A person may seem to be a self-starter or a serious politico — they may talk a good game — but you don’t know for sure if they are or they aren’t until you see them in action.

Bacon supports this commonplace observation with a paraphrasing of Machiavelli: “His instance is, that for the achieving of a desperate conspiracy, a man should not rest upon the fierceness of any man’s nature, or his resolute undertakings; but take such an one, as hath had his hands formerly in blood.”

Make sure your assassins have actually done the foul deed before hiring them to do another!

Bunch of obscure bad guys

“But Machiavel knew not of a Friar Clement, nor a Ravillac, nor a Jaureguy, nor a Baltazar Gerard; yet his rule holdeth still, that nature, nor the engagement of words, are not so forcible, as custom.”

Baltazar Gérard.

Friar Clement must be Jacques Clement, the fanatical Jacobin friar who murdered King Henri III of France. François Ravaillac stabbed another French king, Henry IV, in 1610. Not the best job, being King of France in the early modern period!

Jaureguy… all I’m getting is a French rugby player who competed in the 1924 Olympics. Can’t be him! But Baltazar Gerard assassinated William of Orange in 1584. That is one crabby-looking Frenchman!

The wheels of custom

“In other things, the predominancy of custom is everywhere visible; insomuch as a man would wonder, to hear men profess, protest, engage, give great words, and then do, just as they have done before; as if they were dead images, and engines moved only by the wheels of custom.”

Habit rules. Actions speak more loudly than words. Judge a person by what they do, not what they say. Like all those verbally ardent environmentalists who drive to work. Ride the bus, I say, and thereby gain more time to read or listen to audiobooks!

Wheel_Iran
Just a really cool-looking wheel, from the Museum of Iran.

Bacon’s examples conflate two meanings of the word custom: “habit,” which we’ve been talking about, and “tradition.”

“We see also the reign or tyranny of custom, what it is. The Indians (I mean the sect of their wise men) lay themselves quietly upon a stock of wood, and so sacrifice themselves by fire. Nay, the wives strive to be burned, with the corpses of their husbands. The lads of Sparta, of ancient time, were wont to be scourged upon the altar of Diana, without so much as queching.”

Pretty sure those wives weren’t so much striving, as struggling to forgo the great honor…

Queching means complaining; obviously the parent of the Yiddish word ‘kvetching.’ Lovely.

“There be monks in Russia, for penance, that will sit a whole night in a vessel of water, till they be engaged with hard ice. Many examples may be put of the force of custom, both upon mind and body.” That one is enough for me – brrr!

Build a better habit

“Therefore, since custom is the principal magistrate of man’s life, let men by all means endeavor, to obtain good customs.”

All your famous givers of advice support this essential practice. Ben Franklin said, “It’s easier to prevent bad habits than to break them.” Ovid, whom Bacon read, wrote “Habits change into character.” Aristotle, whom ditto, wrote “Good habits formed at youth make all the difference.”

vocal_tract“Certainly custom is most perfect, when it beginneth in young years: this we call education; which is, in effect, but an early custom.”

Well, we don’t call it education anymore, although we do expect our schools to inculcate some habits — or maybe only some of us do. The habit of critical thinking, for example, or the habit of checking the facts so you don’t get trolled by Russian mischief-makers. Oh, wait! Those are never part of the public school debate, probably because the loudest debater do not have those habits.

Back to Bacon. “So we see, in languages, the tongue is more pliant to all expressions and sounds, the joints are more supple, to all feats of activity and motions, in youth than afterwards.”

That’s true. A personal example: my jaw gets tired when I speak Spanish for any length of time, just because of the (to me) extra effort of producing dental t’s and d’s instead of alveolar ones. Our ears are likewise trained to discriminate the sounds of our native language more easily than those of languages learned later in life.

“For it is true, that late learners cannot so well take the ply; except it be in some minds that have not suffered themselves to fix, but have kept themselves open, and prepared to receive continual amendment, which is exceeding rare.” With respect to language, there are some people who have what I think of as unfixed phonologies. They learn accents easily, even in adulthood. Many such people moved around a lot as kids.

Custom conjugate

“But if the force of custom simple and separate, be great, the force of custom copulate and conjoined and collegiate, is far greater. For there example teacheth, company comforteth, emulation quickeneth, glory raiseth: so as in such places the force of custom is in his exaltation.”

Habits shared are constantly reinforced. If everyone else is smoking, you’re not going to try so hardtai-chi to quit. But you’re the last person in your building hanging out behind the dumpster in the rain just to get that nicotine fix… On the other hand, if everyone you know works out and eats salads, you’re more likely to do the same. On the third hand, if everyone in your family hops into a chair in the evening with a book, you’re all going to develop a wicked strong reading habit.

“Certainly the great multiplication of virtues upon human nature, resteth upon societies well ordained and disciplined.” Healthy social systems promote healthy individuals? That seems extraordinarily advanced, even for Francis Bacon.

“For commonwealths, and good governments, do nourish virtue grown, but do not much mend the deeds.” OK, this makes no sense. But Whateley’s version has ‘seeds’ instead of ‘deeds’, which is better. Governments support positive adult behaviors, I guess, but don’t do much to encourage the development of such habits in children. We do a lot better these days than in the sixteenth century, which does not yet give us braggin’ rights.

“But the misery is, that the most effectual means, are now applied to the ends, least to be desired.”

Alas, I have no idea what that means. No money quote in this essay!

 

Papers, please! A short history of identification, part 1

My Moriarty mysteries tend to revolve around fraud, of which there was an abundance in the Victorian period. It was so much easier to get away with things back then — not that we’ve abolished fraud in our century. I wanted a character to present a forged check at a bank and wondered how he would go about it. What sort of identification would he have to concoct to succeed?

Turns out the answer was, “None.” Or, more accurately, “The time-honored method of having a person trusted by the receiver vouch for the presenter’s identity personally.” Even as late as 1886, that’s all we had. Amazing!

A book about everything

passport_1866
The first Japanese passport, 1866

I keep saying it and I keep being proved right: there’s a book about everything. In this case, it’s Edward Higgs’ Identifying the English: A History of Personal Identification, 1500 to the Present (2011, New York: Continuum.) The book answered my question, but I don’t really recommend it. The major theme is that identification is imposed by the state for authoritarian purposes which could lead you right into a gas chamber if you’re not careful, which you won’t be, because Commerce has seduced you into a condition of blissful ignorant compliance. The tip-off, as usual, is an abundance of references to Michel Foucault in the introduction. 

We’re going to ignore the trendy polemics and look at how people identified themselves to — yes, of course, usually some state or financial institution. Who else would really care? Oh, doctor’s offices, one would hope; match.commies and their ilk; teachers, dry cleaners…. I’m kind of pro-identification, in the grand scheme of things. Give up a little, I guess, to gain a lot. Let’s not even talk about the benefit of having anything your heart desires delivered to your doorstep in two days!

Social proof

Simon Cole is quoted on p4: “In general, pre-modern societies already had an effective method of Three-Men-before-a-Judgepersonal, and criminal, identification: the network of personal acquaintance through which persons were ‘known’ in the memories and perceptions of their neighbors.” (Only a modern social scientist would put scare quotes around the word ‘known’ in this context. Yes, yes. We ‘know’ no one can ‘know’ anyone.)

And that was it. If you had to prove your identity, you brought some people (men) who knew you to say, “Yes, that’s him!” This is still happening in the Elizabethan period. A minor in the care of the Court of Wards who wanted to prove he had reached his majority had to collect testimony from people who remembered when he was born and have the said testimonials judged by a jury. His birth might have been registered in the parish church by mid-16th century, but more likely not.

Perkin_Warbeck
Perkin Warbeck

I can imagine getting into this situation today, actually. I write as Anna Castle, but she’s not a legal entity. I don’t have any ID for her. What if something came up where I wanted to be recognized as Anna Castle over someone’s objections? (OK, that’s hard to imagine, because who would care?) I couldn’t whip out a driver’s license, a passport, or my university ID. The picture in my paperbacks isn’t that perfect and what if I’d changed my hair? I’d have to summon six friends brave and true to say, “Yep, Heidi and Anna are one and the same person.”

Without such personal testimony, people mis-represented themselves all the time. Easy-bleepin’-peasy. Perkin Warbeck fooled many people in the late 15th century into thinking he was Richard, Duke of York, and thus heir to the English throne.

There’s a long list of imposters on Wikipedia, surprisingly many from the 20th century — a time after which things like fingerprints and passports were available. 

Who are you?

spanish_inquisitor
Fernando Niño de Guevara, Grand Inquisitor of Spain (1600–1602)

What if you really wanted to be sure you had the right person? Let’s say you’re a member of the Spanish Inquisition and you don’t want to waste your time racking the wrong religious rebel. Valentin Groebner’s Who Are You? focuses on the problem of identification in the 15th and 16th centuries.

Quoting Higgs (p.8): “… we learn about the officers of the Inquisition pursuing heretics with the latter’s portraits painted on small linen cloths; of soldiers, city officials and beggars wearing badges of idenfication; of travellers with official letters of safe conduct; of pilgrims issued with health certificates; and of the attempts of Phillip II of Spain to use documents to restrict the passage of heretics, moriscos and Jews to the New World.”

Documents and badges could be easily stolen. And if you were any good as a spy, you could probably replace that linen portrait with a linen portrait of someone else. My people would substitute a portrait of the inquisitor himself — and now I have to go write that down because it sounds like a really great plot for a short story.

 

If you could get your hands on the person’s naked body, you could search for distinguishing marks like moles in the shape of badgers or whatever, tattoos, birth marks. Criminals would be branded or have an ear or a hand cut off. That’s hard to fake and fairly unambiguous. “No, officer, I lost that ear when my head was caught in a mechanical rice picker.”

How to identify yourself

Here’s a list of ways to identify yourself, provided by Higgs (p. 37):

  1. appearance – or how the person looks;
  2. social behaviour – or how the person interacts with others;
    MaoriChief1784
    Maori Chief 1784
  3. names – or what the person is called by other people;
  4. codes – or what the person is called by an organization;
  5. knowledge – or what the person knows;
  6. tokens – or what the person has;
  7. bio-dynamics – or what the person does;
  8. natural physiography – or what the person is; and
  9. imposed physical characteristics – or what the person is now.

So, if they walk you into your supposed office and someone rushes up and says, “There you are! We can’t start the meeting without our director of chicanery!”, your claim is substantially supported. Also, if you speak French, or are unable to speak French. Easier to fake the lack than the possession of knowledge.

I’m not sure where handwriting fits into this list. Is it bio-dynamics? But a very important form of identification before the twentieth century was a letter of recommendation — handwritten, perforce, by someone whose hand is known to the receiver. If you’ve ever taught or worked in a restaurant, you know how quickly you learn to recognize many different hands. 

Here’s a sample of Francis Bacon’s handwriting, which would have been familiar to many people in high places in England during his long life.

bacon_handwriting
From “Certen notes of rememberance owt of the examinacions of H. Walpoole, Jhon Boast & others.”

 

Next time, we’ll look at more forms of non-documentary proofs of identity, edging our way up to the transformations at the turn of the 20th century.

References

Higgs, Edward. 2011. Identifying the English: A History of Personal Identification, 1500 to the Present. New York: Continuum.